Unlike religion, science is not dogmatic and is open to
revision. “But in the frontiers of science there is not much of a
difference between science and religion,” said Nobel Laureate Dan
Shechtman.
Prof. Shechtman is from Technion — Israel
Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. “People have their beliefs and
they would not listen.”
But is that how science
should be? “You are absolutely correct. Science should not be this way,
because sometimes people are wrong,” the Laureate said. “A good
scientist is a humble person who is willing to listen and not somebody
who thinks he knows everything.”
Prof. Shechtman won
the Nobel Prize for chemistry last year for his 1984 discovery of
quasicrystals (non-repeating regular patterns of atoms). He had used a
transmission electron microscope (TEM) to study the quasicrystals.
“When I published my work many repeated my results and immediately said, hey, we have it,” he said.
His
personal experience convinced him that in the frontiers of science
there is little difference between science and religion. “It was a
discovery challenging a community of X-ray crystallographers. They were
really against me for ten years,” he noted.
The
science of crystallography was defined as X-ray crystallography. Hence
all results were to be obtained using X-rays and nothing else. “This
community of X-ray crystallographers wanted him to get X-ray diffraction
results” before they could accept his results.
It
took his team three years (from 1984 to 1987) to produce the first large
enough crystal that is fraction of a millimetre in size. “Only then we
could get an X-ray diffraction pattern” he said. The X-ray
crystallographers finally accepted his results when he finally presented
the X-ray diffraction results at a meeting in Australia. “They
redefined crystals. This was a paradigm shift,” he said.
According
to a press release from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences ,
quasicrystals “fundamentally altered how chemists conceive of solid
matter.”
According to the classical definition,
crystals can have rotational symmetries of one, two, three, four and
six. Five-fold symmetry and symmetries beyond six were thought to be
impossible in periodic structures.
The atoms inside a
crystal have to necessarily be packed in a symmetrical pattern so that
they are ordered and repeated periodically. But quasicrystals meet only
one of the two conditions — they are ordered materials, but the atomic
order is quasiperiodic rather than periodic. It is this combination that
allows the formation of crystal symmetries, such as icosahedral
symmetry.
Talking about tenacity, he recalled his
struggle. “I experienced severe criticism for ten long years,” he said.
Those who opposed his results were not experimentalists, and the reason
for opposing them was not on scientific grounds. “This cannot be
[correct], they said. ‘But this cannot be’ was not based on the second
law of thermodynamics but was based on a paradigm,” he said. After all,
hundreds of thousands of crystals were studied before and not one of
them turned out to be a quasicrystal.
But Prof.
Shechtman took the road less travelled and used a TEM to study
quasicrystals. These cannot be found using X-ray diffraction (unless
they are grown to at least a fraction of a millimetre) as they are so
small. “So the question is why didn’t others see it before I did. It is
not because it is not stable or rare or difficult to make,” he asked.
Using
a different tool is only the beginning. “It is not enough to operate a
TEM. You must be an expert on TEM. The number of TEM experts is very
few,” he said.
But when he finally observed
quasicrystals he did not understand their significance. “I thought what I
saw was just an artefact caused by twins. So I was looking for twins
that have boundary between crystals giving mirror images. I did not find
it and I knew I did not have twins,” he recalled. “Everything happened
in just one day on April 8, 1982.”
Quasicrystals have low heat conductivity and non-stick properties. “It is better than Teflon as it does not stretch,” he said.
(This
Correspondent is one of the two journalists from India participating in
the 62ndNobel Laureates Meeting at Lindau, Germany, at the invitation
of the German Research Foundation (DFG) Bonn.)
Keywords: Lindau Nobel Laureates Meeting, Nobel Laureates, Dan
Comments
Post a Comment